Directed Pronunciation - A New English Grammar

Infinitive or Gerund - ? The area of infinitive or gerund is as much of a headache for students as it is for teachers. On the other hand, the native speaker has a perfect control over the choice. Again, it all comes down to the instinctive use of language and to how our brains have programmed the information in terms of the positional dynamic of pronunciation.  Back in the classroom, however, many teachers still use the old tedious method of list learning which essentially achieves two purposes: 1. That the teacher, having the lists, is shown to be knowledgeable. 2. That certain students will excel at list-learning, gaining confidence at the expense of others. Assuming that the area needs to be learnt in such a fashion, native speakers would need to learn in the same way and if the area was actually difficult or confusing, many natural errors would, in fact, result. Of course, in reality, no errors are made by native speakers when choosing a gerund or infinitive in

Time Frames Time can be divided into three broad areas:Past, Present and Future Past Time _________________________________________________ Past time is divided into straight past that fixes an event to a moment in time and previous past events which can occur either prior to another past fixed point in time or float more loosely in the past as an imperfect past - which describes something that used to happen during a period of previous time - perhaps something we did when we were young or simply something that we don't do anymore: I went to the bank yesterday. (straight past) Before that I had stopped at the office to see Jack.   (previous past in relation to the straight past) In the past, I banked at The First National Bank. ( I used to bank at...) Imperfect past - during a period (seen in the abstract) I smoked a cigarette. (straight past - one off event) I smoked Cuban cigars. ( I don't smoke them anymore - either too expensive or stopped the habit) Previo

The Imperfect Past The idea that English has an imperfect past might seem strange at first but, in truth, all senses can and are reflected in any language. What this means is that if the idea exists in one language, Portuguese for example – our champion of verb tenses –  then the same expression must also be possible in other languages, even if the sense is not reflected in the spelling of the written transcription (visible tense marking). Unfortunately, for those who had become used to the absence of the imperfect, I must inform all that the imperfect has always been present in the language. Although there is no new written form to learn – no  different endings – there is, however, quite a different intention or inflection involved. Instead of reflecting back to a moment fixed in time past, the imperfect carries a sense of period, a closed but, nevertheless, extended time and, as such, moves from a previous time position to a later one. Thus our imperfect must move forward. Imp

  A verb tense, in the strictest definition of the term, is the time frame in which the action is placed; thus we have the traditional idea of past, present and future tenses and within these three basic time frames, we can also differentiate certain other aspects such as the subjunctive or progressive tenses, plus other ideas such as the imperfect past, the conditional tense, and imperative. The tenses of the verbs, in reality, rely entirely on the directions we employ over them. Whereas conjugation is the movement in the pronunciation which indicates the relative position of the subject of the verb - personal vectors - the tense of the verb is a different relative positioning in our conception of time, thought and attitude. In English, it may at first seem difficult to perceive the difference in verb tenses due to the absence of easily identifiable verb endings; the tags that identify both the tense and person; thus discerning the different senses (or directions) is also, at first s

The blog is currently undergoing certain changes to better organise the ideas, features and resources In this space, apart from self learning pages, exercises and ready made video transcripts to link to news, songs and video comedy, you will further find a totally new vision of grammar - which I have called Directed Pronunciation, which, in this case, has been applied to English. The approach is radical and not everyones cup of tea. Indeed, one leading publishing house, Cambridge, said their material would not be confortable next to mine on the same book shelf - so draw your own conclusions. Therefore, be prepared to be shocked but remain open minded in order to change every concept on grammar that you may have ever read. Presented here, grammar is nothing more than a sense (in Portuguese "sentido" sense / direction) a movement, direction, flux or flow. Grammar is the delivery, it carries the voicing and intonation but more than anything else, grammar

Make or Do? With much of the other grammar difficulties falling like flies, how about an explanation for make and do ? The native speaker again has an innate sense of the usage, so once again, in distrust of perfection, without a safety mechanism of some sort, there must be a trick. And it is not as if the choice is deliberate. Only when we compare English to other languages do we see that this separate choice of verbs may be covered by one global solution, for example, Fazer in Portuguese or Hacer in Spanish, which presents one hell of a headache for the poor learner from such cultural comparisons. Now some teachers and teaching methods like to explain the essential difference with arguments like opposing poles of creative actions (make) against the routine ones or even boring ones (do) as the road to success; nevertheless, even with a certain truth to these arguments, I don’t find the argument a conclusive one because this still requires us to think which is right than to simp

Introdução The modal auxiliary of the Past – DID The emphatic form: Pronoun + modal + action He did play Negative phrases are essentially emphatic: Pronoun + modal + negative + action He did not play The separation of the modal and negative elements produces a stronger hammered negative. When the two are contracted, the negative form becomes less marked, making the sound and our expression smoother: Pronoun + modal /negative + action He didn’t play The modal DID is thrown behind the verb to reduce the emphatic weight in the affirmative: Pronoun + action/ modal He play (did) The standard written form results in the -ed ending: He play -ed

Introdução The Grammar Mechanic of the PAST FACTUAL The modal of past pacts is DID 1 DID = fact in the past – a deed – meaning it happened! Placed before the verb, the modal is emphatic and strong sounding. When we wish to reduce the emphatic force, the auxiliary inverts with the verb, bringing more stress onto the verb word. The modal is contracted as an ending and is softer when spoken. The modal did converts into the -ed ending of the so-called regular past verbs. As we can see from the mechanics of the grammar, the modal of fact in the past did, just as we saw with do , can be manipulated, depending on the emphasis we require. With the modal placed behind the verb, we get the sensation that there is a conjugation of the verb; nevertheless, even though the leading sound of each of our so-called regular verbs does not change, there is an ending added to this pure sounding verb. Having said this, we mustn’t forget

THE PAST The typical vision which students learn about the Past Tense in English is that there are some regular verbs that form the past with the ending -ed, others with various irregular changes and yet others that strangely never change at all. Even without conjugational differences in the first, second and third person forms, whether singular or plural, the mere idea that there are regular verbs and irregular verbs casts uncertainty onto the issue and many students even embark on that terrible list-learning, in an attempt to memorize every last verb in the English language. And all this trouble and strife, without mentioning the pronunciation, even with just the so-called “regular” verbs! Nevertheless, if we perceive the past through our new vision of Directed Pronunciation, we can skip around this problem, without the slightest of difficulty. The idea is simple and the best part about it is that there are just two aspects to observe. 1.Shift the verb in the mouth by directing the p

Timeline - How the Present Perfect Tense works Experiences The essence of the present perfect tense pulls the verbal expression down, inside us. This movement reflects our experience and even belief and true knowledge, which even in mediaeval times was placed in the heart. The sense we are aiming for is very similar in all of the following three examples: • I have visited the Louvre. • I believe in aliens. • I know it’s true. No Details The movement physically collapses our lungs. For this reason we do not go into detail, because in simple structures, we can not add extensive information. To add detail of past experiences, we typically use the simple and progressive past tense or use an adverb. • There has been a plane crash • A Transatlantic flight out of Paris crashed at 7.45 pm, twenty minutes after take off. Nobody was killed …etc. Recent Time In a similar movement - a slight variation on the theme - the expression is pulled back and released until the